Within the School Effect rankings I noticed an interesting ranking
of classroom controlled effects vs. out of classroom effects. An element that has been a struggle in my
building recently is how the principal is expected to manage, control and
direct classroom behavior throughout the whole building and in every
classroom. I found the rankings
interesting that the school leader and/or principal ranks lower than overall
effect of classroom behavior and classroom management, which is a control of
the teacher in the classroom. The
numerous guests throughout the last few months, to the Teacher Leadership
Academy , have indicated
that everyone in the building needs to take ownership for all the students in
the building and be part of the development of all the skills. The behavior cannot just be one person’s initiative,
everyone has to agree and enforce the expectations in all areas, at all
times.
Another area I found to be interesting within the Teaching and
Learning ranking was how low inquiry based teaching was on the list, but
questioning (which is a large element of inquiry) was so much higher on the
list. It would be interested to explore
the definition and explanation of Hattie’s idea of inquiry based teaching in
comparison to the work recently published by Harvey and Daniels in Comprehension and Collaboration. Our school completed a book study on this
book and the research throughout the book indicated how beneficial inquiry is
to engage students and to expand their prior knowledge.
The research findings would be interesting to give to our staff
and have them rank the building on what they believe is the effective means
toward student achievement. Then compare
the rankings to Hattie’s list and see where we have discrepancies in our
understanding, then plan our yearly PD in reference to what has proven to be
effective teaching and learning strategies that improve student achievement.
No comments:
Post a Comment